Ethics - Conflicts of Interest

conflict of interest :

- a conflict between the private interests and the official responsibilities of a person in a position of trust
 

This is pretty simple if you ask me.  Conflicts of interest should simply not be allowed to exist in any elected or appointed body in our city.  Period.  Unfortunately, many such conflicts exist currently and have existed many times in North Richland Hill's past.  This practice should be put to an end.  Here are some current and recent examples to consider:
  • Tim Welch, my opponent, owns a civil engineering firm that does work for clients that must come before the city for their project approvals.  He benefits personally if his clients' projects are approved.  Tim has had to abstain from voting due to his conflict.  The Mayor had to vote recently, maybe for the first time in his career as a Council person or Mayor, to break the tie that resulted.

  •    Did the Mayor or any other members of the council give special consideration to Tim's personal interests when they cast their votes?  Would a citizen with a similar project who was not represented by Welch's firm receive equal treatment? 

  • Our newest council person, Suzy Compton, was appointed by Mayor Trevino to fill the unexpired term of Frank Metts, Jr. when he resigned his post.  Ms. Compton has a potential conflict since her brother is "a home builder in a neighboring community"1.  Will her brother do any development in NRH now that she is on City Council?  If so, who's interests will she represent?    Hopefully this particular issue won't come up during her term on the Council.

  •   Stay tuned.

  • Mayor Trevino had conflicts of his own as his construction company did a major portion of the reconstruction work on Rufe Snow Drive while he was acting as Mayor.  He also received special favors from BISD and fellow Council members when he was allowed to locate his concrete plant next to city facilities located on Dick Fisher Road.  The Council voted to rezone the land to allow the plant to be built despite objections raised by residents of a nearby neighborhood.

  •   Would another construction company have received the same courtesy as Mr. Trevino's company?  I think not.  Mayor Trevino is not on the ballot this year but he is an active supporter of the incumbents that are.

Do any of our current council members swap favors?  I don't know for certain.  The real question is, should we have to wonder?  Should there be obvious or likely conflicts of interest on the part of those that make the rules that the rest of us have to follow?  Are we being represented fairly? 

The city has a code of ethics but it does not appear to get much attention from city leaders.  The Ethics section from our NRH City Charter follows:

SECTION 13. ETHICS.

(1) No elected or appointed officer or employee of the City shall benefit unduly by reason of his holding public office.

 (2) No officer or employee having a direct or indirect interest in any proposed or existing contract, purchase, work, sale or service to or by the City shall vote or render a decision, or use his position, authority or influence in a manner that would result in his financial betterment to any degree. Further, any elected officer shall publicly disclose any such interest upon assumption of office or prior to consideration of any such matters. This provision is cumulative to Article 371 and 373 of the Penal Code, and all other applicable laws in regard to elected officers.

 (3) Failure to comply with any provisions of the foregoing Section 13 (1) or 13 (2) shall constitute malfeasance in office and any officer or employee failing to so comply shall immediately forfeit his office or position, and said office or position shall be deemed vacant.

(4) Any violation of the foregoing Sections 13 (1) or 13 (2) with the knowledge, express or implied, of persons or corporations contracting with the City shall render the contract voidable by the Council.

I am unaware of any public declaration made by any current member of the Council when they assumed office, in accordance with the ethics rules of our City Charter.  Should we just ignore the Charter and overlook these conflicts?  You be the judge. 

As I mentioned at the outset, these are only a few current examples of conflicts that exist in our city leadership.  I know of others that I would like to document here, as time permits.  Perhaps some of you have personal experience with or have suffered from the abuses that resulted from such conflicts in our city leadership.  If so, let me hear from you.  Now is the time to do something about it and set things right.

 

1 - NRH City Council Meeting, Dec. 13, 2004


Pol. Adv. paid for by Kerry West